Blog Image

Biuro Spraw Beznadziejnych

...

Więc - żebyś w trosce nie żył, więc - żebyś nie żyła w płaczu, przyjdź do mnie, ponury zwierzu, przyjdź, nocy, targana rozpaczą ...

An essay written in 1995 and published in The Washington Post and The New York Times

Lektura, Sprawozdania Posted on Wed, August 21, 2024 08:38:32

I shall not disclose the author yet. The author describes how leftist mentality has come to dominate in the western world. These are: collectivists, “politically correct” types, feminists, gay and disability activists, animal rights activists and the like. The two common psychological traits in these groups of people are the feeling of inferiority and hypersocialization.  The latter is particularly characteristic of the intellectual elite. The present name for this mentality  is woke, so this is the term I shall use instead.

Low self-esteem Words which are now forbidden had no derogatory connotations before: “negro”,  “handicapped”, and many more. Negative connotations have been attached  by the activists themselves, which discloses their own feelings that these groups are somehow inferior. It was not black ghetto-dwellers or disabled person that stigmatised the language, only the privileged intellectuals. Political correctness was created at the universities by people who did not feel themselves apt to compete, so they invented a venue for themselves as protectors of the weak. 

They hate strong and successful, they hate white males, they hate rationality, etc. They say they hate the West because it is imperialistic, sexist, but these same faults appearing in primitive cultures are excused, e.g. feminists do not care about women in islam. They are driven by craving for power. Helping black people is not the real goal. Instead, race problems serve as an excuse to express their own hostility and frustrated need for power. 

Have you noticed that some words are almost absent in main stream media: “self-confidence”, “self-reliance”, “initiative”, “enterprise”, “optimism”, etc., The dominant narrative is anti-individualistic, pro-collectivist. Society is to blame and to solve every  problem.   

Genetic explanations of human abilities or behaviour are rejected because such explanations tend to make some persons appear superior or inferior to others. The concepts of mental illness, or IQ tests are rejected. Society gets the credit or blame for an individual’s ability or lack of it. The feelings of inferiority run so deep that one cannot tolerate any classification of some things as successful or superior and other things as failed or inferior. One can feel strong only as a member of a large organisation or a mass movement. 

Hypersocial Socialisation of children is training them to think and act as society demands. It would seem that wokes are rebels, but actually these are socially overtrained children who experience that their inner drives sometimes collide with what is demanded of society, which causes feelings of guilt. Wokes are always on high moral grounds and signalling virtue, because deep down inside they are just as any human being: sometimes feeling hatred, envy, drive for power, etc. 

If they rebel, e.g. use violence, they justify their rebellion in terms of mainstream values: they engage in violence to fight against racism. The problems of the woke are indicative of the problems of our society as a whole. Low self- esteem, depressive tendencies and defeatism are not restricted to the left. Though they are especially noticeable in the left, they are widespread in our society. And today’s society tries to socialise us to a greater extent than any previous society. We are even told by experts how to eat, how to exercise, how to make love, how to raise our kids and so forth. 

We can preach equality as much as we want but our psychological reality is social hierarchy. The difference is whether one tries to develop oneself to climb up the hierarchy, or pushes others down the ladder. The latter is the woke style.



Is BBC responsible for riots?

Pytania, Refleksje Posted on Wed, August 21, 2024 08:27:39

Main stream media is the main culprit in all the riots in Europe. Whenever crimes are committed by immigrants the ethnicity of the perpetrators is never disclosed – not to raise racist attitudes. When Pakistanis beat up police at Manchester airport, media focused on police brutality, even if a policewoman got her nose broken. No wonder when they reported that the child killer in Southport was originally from Cardiff no one believed and the gossip started. It turned out the sick kid is a genuine Cardiffian – his parents came to England from Rwanda.

A Polish guy got shot in the presence of his son when he tried to oppose a gang selling narcotics to children in Stockholm. Swedish tv reported that he got in a quarrel with youngsters “Hamnade i konflikt med ungdomar”. Everybody knows these youngsters are mainly ethnic Arabs who terrorise people around, and are not persecuted, unlike “hate speech” directed against them.

The two tier policing overwhelmingly present in Europe is never disclosed by media. Douglas Murrey wrote that British police has not got a single burglar behind bars, but they eagerly imprison anybody who commits hate speech on FB. Who is really the aggressor in UK: muslim gangs or people who oppose them?  A telling fact is that the so called right-wingers are now planting decoy protests in the UK and when the police arrive the only people they find are armed Islamist mobs who mobilized to attack the fake protests. 



The enemies of the people had a conversation

Sprawozdania, Wydarzenia Posted on Wed, August 21, 2024 07:34:07

Musk and Trump had a normal conversation. I have never seen either Kamala or Joe have  an earnest conversation like this. 

Trump is not a stiff politician, he can joke. He said that immigration saved his life: he turned his head to point to a screen with an immigration diagram so the bullet hit his ear not his head.

He is not treated as a human being by media, derided in a similar way as Jews were. I am appalled by the depth of indoctrination against Trump. He is a Hitler. He staged his assassination to get supporters. Democracy will end with him in power. We have hate speech laws but they are never applied to the hate narrative promoted by the main stream media.

Ok, Trump is not ideal, he loves to boast, he is like that, so what? Perhaps he would not overdo it so much if he got credit for his achievements from main stream media. Was he a Hitler during his presidency? Did democracy end then? No. He kept in check all the dictators. He used blackmail or threat, and they did not start any new wars. Trump ended wars which Obama (Nobel Peace Price laureate) started. The result of 4 years of Joe and Co is global nuclear warming. Iran got richer, because China buys its oil, which was not possible under Trump who had agreement with China on oil embargo from Iran. Trump warned Germany that it was getting dependent on energy from Russia, and Nordstream was not opened until Joe came to power. Russia is now weaponised, has close relations with North Korea and China. The world has become much more dangerous place under sleepy Joe than it was under Trump Hitler.

His political priorities accord with the wish of his voters. He wants to stop people coming to US. It is only 4% of the Earth population and people are coming from 100% of the Earth.  Venezuela is down 70% convicted criminals because they are deported to the open US border. Crime is on the rise, and at the same time if you try to stop a thief you’re a racist that should be arrested. Europe has been experiencing this for a long time. I wish I got similar people as Elon and Donald on team Sweden. They plan a “government efficiency commission” to cut down unnecessary spending. Like the present Argentinian president, they plan to eliminate unnecessary federal bureaucracy.

After listening to Trump’s political program I am totally for this administration. But I am a stupid sheep.